From owner-freebsd-java Tue Jun 5 0:24:47 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from heinz.jollem.com (c104187.upc-c.chello.nl [212.187.104.187]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 231F337B405 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 00:24:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ernst@heinz.jollem.com) Received: (from ernst@localhost) by heinz.jollem.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f557Moh02484; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 09:22:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ernst) Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 09:22:50 +0200 From: Ernst de Haan To: Joe Shevland Cc: java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: JDK ports revisited Message-ID: <20010605092250.A2417@c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from J.Shevland@eclipsegroup.com.au on Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 09:18:45AM +1000 Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, Considering the feedback I've received I'm going to take 1 or 2 days this week to make all or most of the suggested changes to the current ports. I will test them privately and then submit them to this mailing list for testing and for approval. After that we can ask the committers to do what they do best ;) One other suggestion for the ports that have a RUN_DEPENDS on a Java VM: We could make them all to specify what JDK should be installed if none is installed by using the JDK_PORT variable in the Makefile as follows: RUN_DEPENDS= ${JAVAVM}:${PORTSDIR}/${JDK_PORT} JAVAVM?= ${LOCALBASE}/bin/javavm JDK_PORT?= java/jdk Or, in a more advanced manner: RUN_DEPENDS= ${JAVAVM}:${PORTSDIR}/${JDK11_PORT} JAVAVM?= ${LOCALBASE}/bin/javavm JDK11_PORT?= java/jdk Kind regards, Ernst Joe Shevland wrote: > Hi, > > Barring any technical difficulties, I think all of the below are excellent > suggestions for consistency. > > Regards, > Joe > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ernst de Haan [mailto:ernst@jollem.com] > > Sent: Friday, 1 June 2001 6:44 PM > > To: java@FreeBSD.ORG > > Subject: JDK ports revisited > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > Following is the suggested short term solution to solving the issues > > surrounding our JDK ports. Considering the discussions we had > > I would like to > > make this proposal and I would *really* like to see some > > feedback, either > > positive or negative. > > > > Step 1: > > ------- > > > > (a) Rename a few ports: > > * java/jdk -> java/jdk11 > > * java/jdk12-beta -> java/jdk12 > > * java/linux-jdk -> java/linux-blackdown-jdk12 > > * java/linux-jdk13 -> java/linux-sun-jdk13 > > * java/linux-jdk14 -> java/linux-sun-jdk14 > > * java/jdk-doc -> java/jdk11-doc > > > [...] > -- Ernst de Haan Java Architect Jollem Information Technology "Come to me all who are weary and burdened and I will give you rest" -- Jesus Christ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message