From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Jan 14 8:21: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mgp.silliman.net (mgp.silliman.net [207.207.193.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68EEC15211 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 08:20:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gws@silliman.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mgp.silliman.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA64799; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 11:24:57 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gws@silliman.net) Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 11:24:57 -0500 (EST) From: Guy Silliman X-Sender: gws@localhost To: "Nicholas J. Dear" Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bandwidth limiting on Switch. In-Reply-To: <200001141219.MAA29003@post.mail.areti.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I have used Structured Internetworking's IPath. It is a nice devide for handling exactly what you are looking to do... I was using it in an identical situation. Works great and the price tag is less than the packeteer I think.... Guy On Fri, 14 Jan 2000, Nicholas J. Dear wrote: > Hi, > > We're about to start doing some co-location, and we will need to restrict the > bandwidth to each machine. I'm assuming we need some sort of switch with > bandwidth throttling capabilities? > > We'd need to throttle from 32K, or 64K upwards, in 64K increments. > > Could anyone recommend a particular product, or how they do the job? > TIA. > N. > -- > Nicholas J. Dear > Mail: ndear@areti.net Tel: +44 (0)20-8402-4041 > Areti Internet Ltd., http://www.areti.co.uk/ > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message