From owner-freebsd-ports  Mon Mar 12  1:20: 6 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DA5C37B718
	for <freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org>; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 01:20:03 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f2C9K3o78645;
	Mon, 12 Mar 2001 01:20:03 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats)
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 01:20:03 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200103120920.f2C9K3o78645@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: <andrew@ugh.net.au>
Subject: RE: ports/25717: Update to xforms port
Reply-To: <andrew@ugh.net.au>
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR ports/25717; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: <andrew@ugh.net.au>
To: Mike Heffner <mheffner@vt.edu>
Cc: <gena@NetVision.net.il>, <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org>
Subject: RE: ports/25717: Update to xforms port
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 19:18:17 +1000 (EST)

 On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Mike Heffner wrote:
 
 > Xforms has been downgraded from 0.89 -> 0.88 because .89 is very buggy. Is
 > there a specific feature of .89 that is needed?
 
 I was trying to get away without installing the compat3x distribution.
 0.89 was built under 4.x apparently. Its not tragic (and infact I have
 installed compat3x now) but I thought since I had upgraded the port I may
 as well submit it. Some of the changes could be made to the 0.88 port even
 without upgrading it...I think it cp's a man page instead of linking it
 and it doesn't respect the CC variable etc
 
 Thanks,
 
 Andrew
 

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message