From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jul 20 21:46:29 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C274C21E;
 Sun, 20 Jul 2014 21:46:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78C5E2F6E;
 Sun, 20 Jul 2014 21:46:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <lists@opsec.eu>)
 id 1X8yw9-000NXE-8d; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 23:46:29 +0200
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 23:46:29 +0200
From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>
To: Daniel Feenberg <feenberg@nber.org>
Subject: Re: Future of pf / firewall in FreeBSD ? - does it have one ?
Message-ID: <20140720214629.GF197@home.opsec.eu>
References: <53C706C9.6090506@com.jkkn.dk> <20140718110645.GN87212@FreeBSD.org>
 <20140718151255.b3e677d9.gerrit.kuehn@aei.mpg.de>
 <CALfReycHtSi5GXgFZihrTsgDG6wc-ZfkYmQu7AjQmOKdeXntrA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEeRwNV3bJrM5KrGObZtNvSY1mVMW9jz2M4t2m2SSq_vvWmZ5w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALfReyfWJd7YOi_Y8Mq=Q-xndLueF7vU5xwc1w_YGyM1a9DQZA@mail.gmail.com>
 <53CA2D39.6000204@sasktel.net>
 <CALfReyfkZY1ZDNohP6npRVQfjBK2M6j59R8idUGazr1yJDX3Jg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140720123916.GV96250@e-new.0x20.net>
 <alpine.LRH.2.11.1407201430030.2748@nber7.nber.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.11.1407201430030.2748@nber7.nber.org>
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org,
 FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 21:46:29 -0000

Hi!

> > And you don't seem to get the point that _someone_ has to do the work.
> > No one has stepped up so far, so nothing is going to change.

Franco Fichtner said he's interested in doing it. He probably
needs funding.

> No one with authority has yet said that "If an updated pf were available,
>   would be welcomed".

Which person or group would you view as "authority" in this case ?

-- 
pi@opsec.eu            +49 171 3101372                         6 years to go !