From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 28 18:19:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37BE0106566B; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:19:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:ffff::1279]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFCBD8FC23; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:19:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:2464::4] (shumai.marcuscom.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:2464::4]) by creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m5SIK97f084986; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:20:09 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Volker Stolz In-Reply-To: <7D63219B-DB97-41D1-B4DE-F191F0F93FD6@FreeBSD.org> References: <7D63219B-DB97-41D1-B4DE-F191F0F93FD6@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Ua8BAiu0QuZnHvViHP4m" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:19:43 -0400 Message-Id: <1214677183.86194.5.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on creme-brulee.marcuscom.com Cc: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Issue with gdmchooser (2.20.6) X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:19:34 -0000 --=-Ua8BAiu0QuZnHvViHP4m Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 13:04 +0800, Volker Stolz wrote: > Hi guys, I was playing with XDMCP and the gdmchooser drops the =20 > following in syslog when looking for local interfaces to broadcast on: >=20 > Jun 23 12:32:13 pc139 gdmchooser[37872]: CRITICAL: Could not get =20 > SIOCGIFFLAGS for ^\b > Jun 23 12:32:13 pc139 gdmchooser[37872]: CRITICAL: Could not get =20 > SIOCGIFFLAGS for 8^R^C >=20 > It looks like there's something going wrong (I'm on 7.0-R with a =20 > bge0,plip0,lo0), and we don't have the SIOCGIFNUM ioctl anyway. Is =20 > someone interested in getting something like the following patch into =20 > the port and/or upstream? [Note that I usually don't program in C ;)] This patch seems pretty intrusive. However, I appreciate the report, and I'll look at creating something more portable. Joe --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-Ua8BAiu0QuZnHvViHP4m Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkhmgL4ACgkQb2iPiv4Uz4fTsACfd577+bAC6WIYNDihm7lDTrWA 2M4AoKTeq5NtNQuYCe8oUI9Z6IBtT40f =gdHG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Ua8BAiu0QuZnHvViHP4m--