From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 9 23: 0:23 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dt051n0b.san.rr.com (dt051n0b.san.rr.com [204.210.32.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A9D437B898 for ; Tue, 9 May 2000 23:00:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@gorean.org) Received: from gorean.org (doug@master [10.0.0.2]) by dt051n0b.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA83476; Tue, 9 May 2000 22:59:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@gorean.org) Message-ID: <3918FAD4.11FEC238@gorean.org> Date: Tue, 09 May 2000 22:59:48 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT-0508 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Brandon D. Valentine" Cc: Alfred Perlstein , David Miller , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Server Farms? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Brandon D. Valentine" wrote: > > On Tue, 9 May 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > >use procmail. > > > >a non-HEAD commit email will look like this: > > Thank you for the suggestion but I already make extensive use of > procmail for sorting signal and noise and have an existing filter to do > this for me. The suggestion was not meant to make my life easier by > removing the need for a filter. The suggestion was meant in the spirit > of conserving bandwidth for the both the Project and the Internet at > large. The missing bit is that it's currently not possible to sort the commit messages at the source, and isn't likely to be in the future. This question comes up often, check the archives for more. Doug -- "Live free or die" - State motto of my ancestral homeland, New Hampshire Do YOU Yahoo!? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message