Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 17:36:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@MIT.EDU> To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@puchar.net> Cc: John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com>, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openssl with aes-in or padlock Message-ID: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1409111736060.21571@multics.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1409112332160.2140@wojtek.dom> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1409111858470.1185@wojtek.dom> <20140911180258.GN82175@funkthat.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1409112332160.2140@wojtek.dom>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > as i already said - geli works fast and make use of AES-NI or padlock > > openssl does not The openssl from ports appears to have an option for padlock, which is disabled by default. I didn't look enough to see whether its 'ASM' option secretly meant aesni or not. -Ben
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.GSO.1.10.1409111736060.21571>