From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 1 06:21:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 815) id AE9A716A4CF; Sun, 1 Aug 2004 06:21:01 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 06:21:01 +0000 From: Murray Stokely To: Marc Fonvieille Message-ID: <20040801062101.GF27954@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20040728205248.GI424@submonkey.net> <20040728230100.GE79225@abigail.blackend.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040728230100.GE79225@abigail.blackend.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/0E451F7D X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: E2CA 411D DD44 53FD BB4B 3CB5 B4D7 10A2 0E45 1F7D cc: Ceri Davies cc: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re:
vs. X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2004 06:21:01 -0000 On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 01:01:00AM +0200, Marc Fonvieille wrote: > > 2) > > foo > > > > bar > > > > > > > [...] > > The 2nd one is maybe better when it comes to think about indentation > levels. And when you are reading a large SGML file it can be useful to > know "where" a section will be rendered, even if the indentation is not > correct you know where you are, with 1st form it may be more difficult. Yes I agree that the second is better. I have done my fair share of moving around s to different levels, and the effort in changing two characters in that instance is well worth the enhanced readability over just
tags. - Murray