From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 27 20:30:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92A87106564A for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 20:30:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 677BA8FC0C for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 20:30:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1RKUFer016056 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 20:30:15 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p1RKUFg2016051; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 20:30:15 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 20:30:15 GMT Message-Id: <201102272030.p1RKUFg2016051@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Sahil Tandon Cc: Subject: Re: ports/154519: [PATCH] net/beacon: update to 1.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Sahil Tandon List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 20:30:15 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/154519; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Sahil Tandon To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, Craig Leres Cc: Subject: Re: ports/154519: [PATCH] net/beacon: update to 1.4 Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 15:24:54 -0500 Please re-send your patch; it was mangled in transit. Also, why do you remove the definition of USE_RC_SUBR? Why do you explicitly set DISTNAME to its default of ${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION}? Why do you remove the EXTRA_PATCHES? Are docs no longer distributed by the upstream? A little more clarity on the rationale for your various edits would be helpful. -- Sahil Tandon