From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 17 17:56:07 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2766A37B401 for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 17:56:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pop018.verizon.net (pop018pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33D2843F85 for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 17:56:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@pcmedx.com) Received: from duron.pcmedx.com ([4.46.1.67]) by pop018.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.33 201-253-122-126-133-20030313) with ESMTP id <20030718005605.CHPW11703.pop018.verizon.net@duron.pcmedx.com> for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 19:56:05 -0500 Received: from mike (mike.pcmedx.com [192.168.240.244]) by duron.pcmedx.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D5794AC95 for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 17:56:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <003f01c34cc7$5e67a700$f4f0a8c0@pcmedx.com> From: "Mike Maltese" To: Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 17:56:06 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at pop018.verizon.net from [4.46.1.67] at Thu, 17 Jul 2003 19:56:05 -0500 Subject: vinum and newfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 00:56:07 -0000 What impact do disk block and fragment sizes have on a vinum volume? I've been benchmarking an array of three drives in striped and raid5 configurations with various stripe sizes. I've noticed that I get better results in just about every instance by passing -b 16384 -f 2048 to newfs. This doesn't make sense to me as those are the defaults for newfs if they are not specified, but looking at the disklabel after a newfs, it shows 8192/1024. Should these options really make a performance difference, and if so, how? Thanks, Mike