Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 04:20:42 -0500 From: James <haesu@towardex.com> To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> Cc: James <haesu@towardex.com> Subject: Re: route cacheing for gif(4) should be optional Message-ID: <20041126092042.GA88208@scylla.towardex.com> In-Reply-To: <20041126091316.GA84369@cell.sick.ru> References: <20041125140641.GA78210@cell.sick.ru> <20041126025510.GA44246@scylla.towardex.com> <20041126091316.GA84369@cell.sick.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 12:13:16PM +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: [ snip ] > > There is no LINK3 flag :) Heheh, good call ;) > > However, gif(4) does not use LINK0 flag. It was used in past. We can utilize > it now. Any objections? I have no objections myself as long as this option is separated from existing link2 feature, so yea I agree in that link0 is good idea there. Thanks! -J -- James Jun TowardEX Technologies, Inc. Technical Lead Boston IPv4/IPv6 Web Hosting, Colocation and james@towardex.com Network design/consulting & configuration services cell: 1(978)-394-2867 web: http://www.towardex.com , noc: www.twdx.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041126092042.GA88208>