From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Aug 28 2:56: 8 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail.SKINNYHIPPO.COM (mail.SKINNYHIPPO.COM [216.25.13.94]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 432D014CC7 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 1999 02:56:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from panda@skinnyhippo.com) Received: from egg [202.188.111.43] by mail.SKINNYHIPPO.COM (SMTPD32-5.05) id A22A63B011C; Sat, 28 Aug 1999 05:55:54 -0400 Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19990828183307.00a005c0@mail.skinnyhippo.com> X-Sender: panda@mail.skinnyhippo.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Sat, 28 Aug 1999 18:33:07 +0900 To: Ludwig Pummer From: chas Subject: Re: adopt a newbie program - Thanks Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: References: <3.0.5.32.19990828040752.00957750@mail.skinnyhippo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 12:01 AM 8/28/99 -0700, Ludwig Pummer wrote: >On Sat, 28 Aug 1999, chas wrote: > >> Person-in-trouble posts a question to the list. >> >> People who know the answer email him/her directly (NOT broadcast to the list). >> >> Person-in-trouble sorts out his/her problem then posts the solution >> back to the list with a subject line that starts "SUMMARY: " followed >> by his/her original question. > >Disadvantages: >1) a person could get 'bad' answers or advice True. That's why I mentioned that it's probably better for a 'managers' community who rely on FreeBSD for their business and have probably got a great amount of experience between them. (I did say it was a bit of a tangent from the original thread). In the past, I've had conflicting recommendations to solve a problem - I simply had to test them out and post the results, saying what worked, to the list. Should it ever happen that a SUMMARY contains false information, it can still be updated/corrected. That happens less than 10% of the time. >2) mail archives would only have the solution(s) if the person bothered to >post a SUMMARY. I doubt you could actually _force_ someone to post it if >he/she didn't want to, so... No, you can't force them. The point is that the amount of traffic/noise is reduced; as the nature of the communications then become more valuable, people do indeed post summaries... also, you get this big guilty feeling if you don't. Beyond that, there was one guy who kept asking dumbo questions for stuff that was often in the FAQ, never sent a SUMMARY and didn't get much help thereafter. I, for one, sometimes feel guilty that I am unable to answer as many questions as I ask. But by posting summaries, you're sort of 'giving back' and helping others further down the line. Ok, I'll drop it for another 2 years :) chas To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message