From owner-freebsd-security Mon Dec 4 22:41: 8 2000 From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 4 22:41:05 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from daedalus.cs.brandeis.edu (daedalus.cs.brandeis.edu [129.64.3.179]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4140437B401 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 22:41:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (meshko@localhost) by daedalus.cs.brandeis.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA22614; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 01:40:33 -0500 Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 01:40:33 -0500 (EST) From: Mikhail Kruk To: Jordan Hubbard Cc: Warner Losh , Mike Silbersack , pW , John Howie , Subject: Re: Fw: NAPTHA Advisory Updated - BindView RAZOR In-Reply-To: <46236.975996011@winston.osd.bsdi.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: meshko@daedalus.cs.brandeis.edu Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org uh, sorry didn't see that Jordan already told about that. BTW, here is what I've noticed: if you look at netcraft's report about hotmail http://uptime.netcraft.com/graph/?host=www.hotmail.com it seems that they've added 2 more machines during the transition. Which, if I interpret data correctly, means that they had to increase their machine park by almost 30%. > With all due respect to everyone in this discussion, Hotmail completed > its transition to Win2K about a month and a half ago and evicted the > last FreeBSD machine from its premises. > > I'm sure this was neither easy or even particularly necessary from a > technical perspective, but from a marketing perspective they were > *very* tired of us making so much marketing hay over FreeBSD at > hotmail and when the end finally came, it came very thoroughly. > > - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message