From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 30 06:49:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3A3216A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 06:49:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pd3mo1so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F0B343D6E for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 06:49:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from flowers@users.sourceforge.net) Received: from pd2mr1so.prod.shaw.ca (pd2mr1so-ser.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.110])2003))freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 07:49:02 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pn2ml1so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.145]) by pd2mr1so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0HWZ00AO3L1I27N0@pd2mr1so.prod.shaw.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 07:48:54 -0600 (MDT) Received: from sirius (S0106004001438e5b.cg.shawcable.net [68.144.47.89]) by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.18 (built Jul 28 2003)) with ESMTP id <0HWZ00F07L1PWH@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 07:49:02 -0600 (MDT) Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 07:48:58 -0600 From: Danny MacMillan In-reply-to: <6.0.0.22.0.20040429140657.11cf1120@pop.face2interface.com> To: Marty Landman , Mikkel Christensen , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT User-Agent: Opera7.23/Win32 M2 build 3227 References: <200404262126.36157.mikkel@talkactive.net> <200404291406.58150.mikkel@talkactive.net> <6.0.0.22.0.20040429101444.0e68a6a0@pop.face2interface.com> <200404291713.13999.mikkel@talkactive.net> <6.0.0.22.0.20040429140657.11cf1120@pop.face2interface.com> Subject: Re: Suexec with Apache 1.3.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 13:49:02 -0000 On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 14:20:14 -0400, Marty Landman wrote: > > ... > > On the side, this makes me wonder what the philosophy is on Windows > servers where the whole permissions concept is nonexistent afaik. Actually, server-side Windows has had much more sophisticated filesystem permissions than the standard Unix file permissions since NT, when it began using ACLs. The addition of filesystem ACLs to FreeBSD is much more recent. That's about the extent of my knowledge; it's probable that other Unix or Unix-like operating systems were using filesystem ACLs earlier than FreeBSD. -- Danny