From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 22 17:47:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25CEB16A402 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:47:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: from mail.digitalfreaks.org (arbitor.digitalfreaks.org [216.151.95.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 061FD13C442 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:47:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: by mail.digitalfreaks.org (Postfix, from userid 1022) id 222FA182DF; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:46:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.digitalfreaks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23F56182D7; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:46:48 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:46:30 -0500 (EST) From: "Brian A. Seklecki" X-X-Sender: lavalamp@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org To: Wojciech Puchar In-Reply-To: <20080222180044.D4445@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Message-ID: <20080222124538.J83174@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org> References: <47A6287C.9040902@gmail.com> <20080203233311.X7800@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <1203698632.10391.130.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> <20080222180044.D4445@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Gunther Mayer , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: automatic fsck on gmirror failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:47:01 -0000 On Fri, 22 Feb 2008, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >> >> $ grep -i fsck /etc/defaults/rc.conf >> fsck_y_enable="NO" # Set to YES to do fsck -y if the initial preen >> fails. >> >> gmirror(8) / geom(8) should automatically remove (degrade) components >> with bad I/O operations after a certain threshold, but I'm pretty sure >> it doesn't. > > yes it does Maybe my experiences didn't his the threshold. I'm checking the code now. The threshold is likely compile-time adjusable. ~BAS