From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Fri Oct 5 20:55:08 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F20E910B67FA for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 20:55:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F37A70B99 for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 20:55:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 5345910B67F9; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 20:55:07 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41C6310B67F8 for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 20:55:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D481870B97 for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 20:55:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26C6F2457A for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 20:55:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w95Kt5qu001709 for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 20:55:05 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w95Kt5ve001706 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 20:55:05 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 231814] [patch] Update comms/owfs to 3.2p2 Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2018 20:55:06 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: johan@stromnet.se X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2018 20:55:08 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D231814 --- Comment #4 from Johan Str=C3=B6m --- Comment on attachment 197795 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D197795 owfs 3.1p1 -> 3.2p3 update patch Thanks, OWFS specific stuff looks good to me, but I think current MASTER_SI= TES will not be approved by porters. First of all, remove sourceforge, the project have left Sourceforge in favo= ur of Github, and further releases won't show up there. Second, in bsd.sites.mk there is a DEV_WARNING about using github.com in MASTER_SITES, so I suspect this will be problematic? Not sure how to exactly use it, but the following seems to work with the current port:=20 USE_GITHUB=3Dyes GH_TAGNAME=3Dv${DISTVERSION} Although it doesn't download the release tar.gz but rather tar.gz snapshot = from the repo.. The distfile gets namde owfs-owfs-3.1p1-v3.1p1_GH0.tar.gz and putting that in distinfo seems to build fine... Not sure whats most appropriate, perhaps some port manager can aid with assistance here? Will mark the patch as maint approved and we might get some input! --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=