From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 15 16:09:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAC6A16A41F; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 16:09:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2694C43D49; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 16:09:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55DB15E26; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:09:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 83784-01; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:09:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-122-227.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.122.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 410665D5A; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:09:31 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43A1953F.1050900@mac.com> Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:09:35 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ruslan Ermilov References: <021001c60003$6528ea80$1ec237c0@nms.noc.utoronto.ca> <20051215152905.GH51686@ip.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <20051215152905.GH51686@ip.net.ua> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org, Jin Fang Subject: Re: ipfw table bad command X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 16:09:35 -0000 Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 02:41:08PM -0500, Charles Swiger wrote: [ ... ] >>It was added somewhere around 5.3. Someone running 5.2.1 should >>update to 5.3, 5.4, or consider going to 6.0... > > Wrong. I committed ipfw tables support in sys/netinet/ip_fw2.c#1.60 > while RELENG_5_BP is 1.70. That is, all of 5.>0 kernels should have > it. OK, I was wrong. But that doesn't seem to solve the problem the OP had.... -- -Chuck