From owner-freebsd-mobile Fri Apr 28 0:16:42 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from tld.follo.net (tld.follo.net [195.204.143.184]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A0537BBC9 for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2000 00:16:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from terje@elde.net) Received: by tld.follo.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id AFF187D73; Fri, 28 Apr 2000 09:16:36 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 09:16:35 +0200 From: Terje Elde To: mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Q: proven 100 Mbps cards for 4.0, 5.0? Message-ID: <20000428091635.D22673@tld.follo.net> References: <003201bfb06c$e9353c80$b55a84ce@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.12i In-Reply-To: <003201bfb06c$e9353c80$b55a84ce@yahoo.com>; from adrian@mugnolo.com on Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 10:20:32AM -0700 X-Mailer: Mutt http://www.mutt.org/ X-Editor: Vim http://www.vim.org/ X-IRC: ircii!epic4-2000 - prevail[1214] X-Goal: Exterminate All Rational Thought Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * Adrian Mugnolo (adrian@mugnolo.com) [000427 19:26]: > 3Com 3C574TX > Netgear FA410TXC > Linksys EC2T/PCMPC100 > > Should I add or remove from the list? Comments? I've talked to people who were very happy with the 3com and netgear cards. However, as you're looking spesificly for performance, would it not be a good idea to ask people to post benchmark data instead of just works/don't work? I'll see if I can dig out a 3c574tx and make it run. Then I'll dump some benchmarks on you. Terje -- Terje Elde | Yes Interactive AS | voice: +47 64 85 52 00 terje@yes.no | http://www.yes.no/ | fax: +47 64 85 52 01 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message