Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 13:19:00 -0600 (CST) From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> To: Guido van Rooij <guido@gvr.org> Cc: <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: patch regarding icmp bandwidth limiting Message-ID: <20011105131741.T29695-100000@achilles.silby.com> In-Reply-To: <20011105180418.A32828@gvr.gvr.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 5 Nov 2001, Guido van Rooij wrote: > On Mon, Nov 05, 2001 at 10:23:42AM -0600, Mike Silbersack wrote: > > The first number is the rate at which the machine would be responding > > without limiting enabled. The second number tells you the rate at which > > it is responding. Changing from a pre to a post increment isn't going to > > change what you're seeing. > > > > I was thinking the same, but still the message puzzled me. > > How about changing it from: > Limiting icmp ping response to %d packet per second for %d received > > -Guido I'm not sure that's any more clear. If you can find a wording which is more clear for all the types of limiting, I'll be happy to commit it, but I don't think you're there yet. Mike "Silby" Silbersack To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011105131741.T29695-100000>