From owner-freebsd-current Sat Nov 29 14:49:56 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id OAA25092 for current-outgoing; Sat, 29 Nov 1997 14:49:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current) Received: from dyson.iquest.net (dyson.iquest.net [198.70.144.127]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA25079 for ; Sat, 29 Nov 1997 14:49:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from toor@dyson.iquest.net) Received: (from root@localhost) by dyson.iquest.net (8.8.7/8.8.8) id RAA03183; Sat, 29 Nov 1997 17:49:23 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from toor) From: "John S. Dyson" Message-Id: <199711292249.RAA03183@dyson.iquest.net> Subject: Re: SMP: binding process to CPU In-Reply-To: from Andrzej Bialecki at "Nov 29, 97 11:03:16 pm" To: abial@korin.warman.org.pl (Andrzej Bialecki) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 1997 17:49:22 -0500 (EST) Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: dyson@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Andrzej Bialecki said: > Hi! > > Here's why I'm asking: I have one process which must be as near real-time > as possible, and the second process processes it's output (which is > low-priority task). So I'd be glad to monopolize one CPU full-time when I > need it, and run the rest of the OS on the other one. Is it possible? Will > it be possible? :-) > One of our required goals is to set the affinity in the way that you suggest. It doesn't work that way yet though. -- John dyson@freebsd.org jdyson@nc.com