From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jul  3 00:05:08 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: net@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AD1916A41F;
	Sun,  3 Jul 2005 00:05:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ps@mu.org)
Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 424B243D58;
	Sun,  3 Jul 2005 00:05:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ps@mu.org)
Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id A07A15CBDC; Sat,  2 Jul 2005 17:04:40 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: ps@mu.org
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.119])
	by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B7E3981D01; Fri,  7 Dec 2001 18:32:24 -0600 (CST)
Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.18])
	by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6385D5558F; Fri,  7 Dec 2001 16:32:21 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 538)
	id 03FF937B419; Fri,  7 Dec 2001 16:32:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP
	id E14DA2E8209; Fri,  7 Dec 2001 16:32:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (bulk_mailer v1.12);
	Fri, 7 Dec 2001 16:32:19 -0800
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mass.dis.org (mass.dis.org [216.240.45.41])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B5C5837B416; Fri,  7 Dec 2001 16:32:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mass.dis.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mass.dis.org (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id fB80b8304059;
	Fri, 7 Dec 2001 16:37:13 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org)
Message-Id: <200112080037.fB80b8304059@mass.dis.org>
To: Marko Zec <zec@tel.fer.hr>
In-Reply-To: Message from Marko Zec <zec@tel.fer.hr> 
	of "Fri, 07 Dec 2001 21:44:04 +0100." <3C112A14.21F08D50@tel.fer.hr> 
From: Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO
Lines: 14
Cc: arch@freebsd.org, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>,
	net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Request to back out Luigis polled-net patch in -stable. 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 00:05:08 -0000
X-Original-Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 16:37:08 -0800
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 00:05:08 -0000

> > > I would also like to point to the parallel piece of code: Jun-Itohs
> > > ALTQ for which he reliably has maintained a patch relative to the
...
> > Yes; this is an excellent example of how it can be done better.
> 
> Sorry guys, but aren't you comparing apples with oranges? As far as I

No.  The issue at hand is procedure, not functionality.

ALTQ is maintained and developed in a fashion consistent with the Project's
general procedures and preferences.  Luigi's code commit was not.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message