From owner-freebsd-chat Wed Apr 19 9:30:51 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from happy.checkpoint.com (happy.checkpoint.com [199.203.156.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B1B737B7A2; Wed, 19 Apr 2000 09:30:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mellon@pobox.com) Received: (from mellon@localhost) by happy.checkpoint.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA60624; Wed, 19 Apr 2000 19:29:39 GMT (envelope-from mellon@pobox.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 19:29:38 +0000 From: Anatoly Vorobey To: John Baldwin Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ViM vs. Emacs Message-ID: <20000419192938.A60608@happy.checkpoint.com> References: <20000419103521.A2972@cichlids.cichlids.com> <200004191224.IAA51625@server.baldwin.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <200004191224.IAA51625@server.baldwin.cx>; from jhb@FreeBSD.ORG on Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 08:24:29AM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 08:24:29AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 19-Apr-00 Alexander Langer wrote: > > FYI: ViM is better than Emacs. > > /me thwaps Alex with xemacs I wonder, though, if I'm the only person around who have committed the atrocity of building xemacs with --without-x . -- Anatoly Vorobey, mellon@pobox.com http://pobox.com/~mellon/ "Angels can fly because they take themselves lightly" - G.K.Chesterton To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message