From owner-freebsd-commit Thu Oct 19 19:58:16 1995 Return-Path: owner-commit Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id TAA12032 for freebsd-commit-outgoing; Thu, 19 Oct 1995 19:58:16 -0700 Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id TAA12020 for cvs-all-outgoing; Thu, 19 Oct 1995 19:58:10 -0700 Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id TAA12010 for cvs-CVSROOT-outgoing; Thu, 19 Oct 1995 19:58:08 -0700 Received: from veda.is (root@veda.is [193.4.230.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id TAA12005 ; Thu, 19 Oct 1995 19:57:49 -0700 Received: (from adam@localhost) by veda.is (8.6.12/8.6.12) id CAA01849; Fri, 20 Oct 1995 02:57:30 GMT From: Adam David Message-Id: <199510200257.CAA01849@veda.is> Subject: Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT avail To: asami@freefall.freebsd.org (Satoshi Asami) Date: Fri, 20 Oct 1995 02:57:27 +0000 (GMT) Cc: CVS-commiters@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-CVSROOT@freefall.freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199510200152.SAA09524@freefall.freebsd.org> from "Satoshi Asami" at Oct 19, 95 06:52:47 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME8a] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 718 Sender: owner-commit@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Remove adam, pending appeal. > : > Violation of this will result in revoking of your commit priviledge. > : Fair enough, the actual details of what constitutes "this" are clearly stated in the words of the original message. Somehow this slipped past me amidst the disagreement that both preceded and followed the posting of the freeze message, and it was the original intent that stood out clearest to me... i.e. Absolutely nothing to be committed to this area without explicit permission, except for completely new imports which affect no other parts of the tree. I don't mind serving as an example in this matter, but consider this message to be my appeal. It is not my intent to complain here. Adam