From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 8 18:23:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F098416A4CF for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 18:23:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6E3443D45 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 18:23:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (localhost.nic.fr [IPv6:::1]) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i292NTDa093661 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK CN=khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu issuer=SSL+20Client+20CA); Mon, 8 Mar 2004 21:23:30 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id i292NTJ8093658; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 21:23:29 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 21:23:29 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200403090223.i292NTJ8093658@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Julian Elischer In-Reply-To: References: <20040308214020.73C245D07@ptavv.es.net> X-Spam-Score: -19.8 () IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.37 cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: My planned work on networking stack X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 02:23:34 -0000 < said: > I believe that sme of the patches were considerred "experimental and > just lacked someone to make them production quality. In other cases they > were not against 'current' and porting them to -curren twas left as "an > exercise for the reader". No-one who had that ime had a need for them. Back when I was on core and looked after the network stack, I went around several times with multiple people saying ``please, we would love this code, if only it weren't based on a two-year-old kernel!'' I started my own SACK implementation back in 1996, but it was never finished. (It got caught up in a rewrite of the TCP retransmit queue that proved too difficult to implement.) -GAWollman