Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 11:44:08 +0100 (CET) From: Oliver Fromme <olli@lurza.secnetix.de> To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: UFS2 snapshots on large filesystems Message-ID: <200511141044.jAEAi8bg020303@lurza.secnetix.de> In-Reply-To: <43779EB1.5070302@centtech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Eric Anderson <anderson@centtech.com> wrote: > Oliver Fromme wrote: > > I just accidentally pulled the wrong power cord ... > > So now I can give you first-hand numbers. :-} > > > > This is a 250 Gbyte data disk that has been newfs'ed > > with -i 65536, so I get about 4 million inodes: > > > > Filesystem iused ifree %iused > > /dev/ad0s1f 179,049 3,576,789 5% > > > > So I still have 95% of free inodes, even though the > > filesystem is fairly good filled: > > > > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity > > /dev/ad0s1f 237,652,238 188,173,074 30,466,986 86% > > > > fsck(8) took about 2 minutes, which is acceptable, I > > think. Note that I always disable background fsck > > (for me personally, it has more disadvantages than > > advantages). > > > > This is what fsck(8) reported when the machin came > > back up: > > > > /dev/ad0s1f: 179049 files, 94086537 used, 24739582 free > > (26782 frags, 3089100 blocks, 0.0% fragmentation) > > 180k inodes seems like a pretty small amount to me. It's my multimedia disk. It contains mainly multimedia files, such as images, audio and video files. > Here's some info from some of my filesystems: > > # df -i > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity iused ifree %iused Mounted on > /dev/amrd0s1d 13065232 1109204 10910810 9% 663 1695079 0% /var > /dev/label/vol1 1891668564 1494254268 246080812 86% 68883207 175586551 28% /vol1 > /dev/label/vol2 1891959846 924337788 816265272 53% 59129223 185364087 24% /vol2 > /dev/label/vol3 1892634994 1275336668 465887528 73% 31080812 213506706 13% /vol3 > > Even /var has over 1million. No. Your /var has just 663 inodes in use, and it has about 1.7 million unused inodes which is just a waste. Your other file systems use much more inodes, but they're also much bigger (2 Tbyte) than mine, and they seem to contain different kind of data. > I think your tests are interesting, > however not very telling of many real-world scenarios. As mentioned above, my "test" was done on my multimedia file system with an average file size of roughly 1 Mbyte. Such file systems are quite real-world. :-) On a file system containing exclusively video files, innd cycle buffers or similarly large files, the inode density can be reduced even further. If you have a 2 Tbyte file system that contains only a few thousand files, then you're wasting 60 Gbytes for unused inode data. Of course, if you design a file system for different purposes, your requirements might be completely different. A maildir server or squid proxy server definitely requires a much higher inode density, for example. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing Dienstleistungen mit Schwerpunkt FreeBSD: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. Perl is worse than Python because people wanted it worse. -- Larry Wall
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200511141044.jAEAi8bg020303>