From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Feb 6 01:38:08 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA16429 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Sat, 6 Feb 1999 01:38:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from thelab.hub.org (nat0716.mpoweredpc.net [142.177.190.208]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA16424 for ; Sat, 6 Feb 1999 01:38:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (scrappy@localhost) by thelab.hub.org (8.9.2/8.9.1) with ESMTP id FAA04683; Sat, 6 Feb 1999 05:37:30 -0400 (AST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) X-Authentication-Warning: thelab.hub.org: scrappy owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 6 Feb 1999 05:37:30 -0400 (AST) From: The Hermit Hacker To: "Dan O'Connor" cc: Frank Warren , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Unix vs unix-like and unix-type In-Reply-To: <057a01be51aa$b1cdd760$ed3ce4cf@danco.home> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 6 Feb 1999, Dan O'Connor wrote: > Well, true. The Microsoft y2k database lists Win98 as being y2k compliant. > Lo-and-behold, the Windows Update site now has a y2k patch for Win98. Solaris 2.6 is the same...listed as being y2k compliant, but there are several y2k related patches available for it...*shrug* Marc G. Fournier Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message