From owner-freebsd-security Thu Nov 11 12: 2: 6 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from java.dpcsys.com (java.dpcsys.com [206.16.184.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 194DB14CA2 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 1999 12:01:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dan@dpcsys.com) Received: from localhost (dan@localhost) by java.dpcsys.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id MAA05433; Thu, 11 Nov 1999 12:00:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 12:00:51 -0800 (PST) From: Dan Busarow To: Mitch Collinsworth Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BIND NXT Bug Vulnerability In-Reply-To: <199911111942.AA298389320@broccoli.graphics.cornell.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 11 Nov 1999, Mitch Collinsworth wrote: > Dan Busarow wrote: > >You could also edit src/port/freebsd/Makefile.set and change > >DESTETC to suit. > > Does DESTETC really control this? I was poking around looking for > why it was looking in /etc rather than /etc/namedb and found this. > Then I looked back at my 8.1.2 install which was from the ports and > defaults to /etc/namedb and DESTETC was set to /etc there as well. Don't know for sure, the port may change it in pathtemplate.h But INSTALL claims that setting DESTETC is the way to do it. > Oddly, the default ISC install creates an /etc/namedb/named.conf, > but the named it creates looks for /etc/named.conf. Weird. Odd, didn't for me when I installed it, my named.conf isn't actually in /etc/namedb so it should have if it wanted to. Dan -- Dan Busarow 949 443 4172 Dana Point Communications, Inc. dan@dpcsys.com Dana Point, California 83 09 EF 59 E0 11 89 B4 8D 09 DB FD E1 DD 0C 82 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message