From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 22 01:43:47 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72D1E16A4CE for ; Sat, 22 Nov 2003 01:43:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.datanet.hu (mx1.datanet.hu [194.149.13.165]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D2CA43FDD for ; Sat, 22 Nov 2003 01:43:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sziszi@bsd.hu) Received: from momo.buza.adamsfamily.xx (amazonas-139.adsl.datanet.hu [195.56.240.139]) by mx1.datanet.hu (DataNet) with ESMTP id 5F981DA0C6 for ; Sat, 22 Nov 2003 10:43:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from momo.buza.adamsfamily.xx (localhost [127.0.0.1]) hAM9i207001867 for ; Sat, 22 Nov 2003 10:44:02 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sziszi@bsd.hu) Received: (from sziszi@localhost) by momo.buza.adamsfamily.xx (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hAM9i1bY001853 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Sat, 22 Nov 2003 10:44:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sziszi@bsd.hu) X-Authentication-Warning: momo.buza.adamsfamily.xx: sziszi set sender to sziszi@bsd.hu using -f Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 10:43:59 +0100 From: Szilveszter Adam To: "'freebsd-current@freebsd.org'" Message-ID: <20031122094357.GA1603@momo.buza.adamsfamily.xx> Mail-Followup-To: Szilveszter Adam , "'freebsd-current@freebsd.org'" References: <20031121173342.X61191@carver.gumbysoft.com> <20031122024417.GA93051@pit.databus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031122024417.GA93051@pit.databus.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i Subject: Re: dumb question 'Bad system call' after make world X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 09:43:47 -0000 Hello, On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 09:44:17PM -0500, Barney Wolff wrote: > Does make world build a kernel? I didn't think so, and OP's message > indicates that make world is all he did. I suspect re-install is the > best answer now. Yes, make world does not build or install kernels. I'd also go for reinstall, provided the OP has not yet put a lot of work into customising the install... > Will somebody please tell me when "make world" is ever correct in the > environment of the last several years? I've been unable to understand > its continued existence as a target. One of it's last hideouts seems to be the "make release" target... -- Regards: Szilveszter ADAM Budapest Hungary