Date: Sat, 03 Jul 1999 03:28:20 +0200 From: Roelof Osinga <roelof@eboa.com> To: Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu> Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IP alias routing problem Message-ID: <377D6734.7658164D@eboa.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9907021302160.98238-100000@resnet.uoregon.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug White wrote: > > > route add -net 194.134 194.134.128.1 > > This isn't necessary, as the ifconfig command will add it automatically. > Make the above fix and you should be happy. Performed a "route change -net 0 212.187.0.1 -hopcount 2" so as to lower the priority of the default route, but alas. Happiness is not to be mine so easily. To wit: nl:/home/www/Slak/Bestuur$ traceroute 194.134.5.5 traceroute to 194.134.5.5 (194.134.5.5), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 212.187.0.39 (212.187.0.39) 0.695 ms 0.406 ms 0.375 ms 2 212.187.0.39 (212.187.0.39) 0.393 ms !H 0.400 ms !H 0.384 ms !H Given the default hopcount above and this routing table: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default 212.187.0.1 UGSc 1 159001 ep1 194.134/16 194.134.128.1 UGSc 0 841 ep1 194.134.128/22 link#2 UC 0 0 ep1 194.134.128.1 0:90:6d:e4:30:0 UHLW 1 14896 ep1 1191 212.187/21 link#2 UC 0 0 ep1 212.187.0.1 0:90:6d:e4:30:0 UHLW 1 12 ep1 951 212.187.0.39 0:60:97:e4:98:db UHLW 0 48 lo0 one would've expected more bliss to be one's reward. Instead woe is mine! With a default hopcount of 0 and me having bumped the default route to a hopcount of 2 why does it insist of routing through the wrong, uhm, alias? One grovels humbly at the feets of ones masters in the hopes of becoming blessed by - surely undeserved! - enlightement from the cyberskies above. Roelof -- Home is where the (@) http://eboa.com/ is. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?377D6734.7658164D>