From owner-cvs-all Fri May 17 4: 0:59 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (whale.sunbay.crimea.ua [212.110.138.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DEF337B409; Fri, 17 May 2002 04:00:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from ru@localhost) by whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (8.11.6/8.11.2) id g4HAxr513602; Fri, 17 May 2002 13:59:53 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 13:59:53 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: "David O'Brien" , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile.inc1 src/gnu/lib Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/cc Makefile Message-ID: <20020517105953.GC75925@sunbay.com> References: <200205151629.g4FGTj062213@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020515150513.A14077@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020516055741.GA26715@sunbay.com> <20020516014650.A41621@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020516103848.GA65503@sunbay.com> <20020516115207.B67791@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pAwQNkOnpTn9IO2O" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020516115207.B67791@dragon.nuxi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --pAwQNkOnpTn9IO2O Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 11:52:07AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 01:38:48PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > Yes I did look at the diffs. What C++ compiler do we have that is na= med=20 > > > "c++" other than the system one? Certainly none of the GCC ports I > > >=20 > > Obviously I just added _more_ variants for the external C++ compiler. >=20 > Tell me which compiler? I don't want "in theory", I want "real world". >=20 > 1. You are backing out my changeds from only 5 days ago w/o asking me to > explain them. =20 > =20 > 2. The bit you show as an example is only part of your change. You > totally backed out some of my changes: >=20 > +# $FreeBSD: /c/ncvs/src/Makefile.inc1,v 1.277 2002/05/15 16:29:44 ru = Exp $ > -.if ${CXX} =3D=3D "c++" > -NO_CXX=3D yes > -.endif >=20 > +# $FreeBSD: /c/ncvs/src/gnu/lib/Makefile,v 1.37 2002/05/15 16:29:45 r= u Exp $ > -.if ${CXX:T} =3D=3D "c++" > -NO_CXX=3D yes > -.endif >=20 > +# $FreeBSD: /c/ncvs/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/Makefile,v 1.30 2002/05/15 16:= 29:45 ru Exp $ > [you removed c++, c++filt, and doc from the build] > =20 >=20 > I do not think you understand the issues here. Since discussing things > is now dangerous as hell around here. I am going to simply ask core to > have you back out your commit under "Big List of Rules" #6. >=20 If anyone really listens to this, we're currently working with -core on resolving the issue. > > > > in a normal bootstrapping sequence no special hacks are necessary. > > >=20 > > > Gperf is written in C++. If you have no system C++ compiler and CXX = is > > > set to its stock value; how are you going to build gperf? We experie= nce > > > this in the Sparc64 world where we never had a 2.95 system compiler. > >=20 > > If that's the case, you want to cross-compile the sparc64 world (or only > > gperf) using say i386 version of the sparc64 cross-compiler. =20 >=20 > How is that going to help?? A C++ support libraries that does not exist > on the i386 or sparc64 natively, will some how pop out of the build? >=20 They _do_ exist on 4.x. A 4.x i386 host can build "gperf" that can later be used to build cc1plus for sparc64. > > I fail to > > see how the check of whether "gperf" is in the PATH (the check is as > > simple as for kldxref(8) in sys/modules/Makefile) helps you to proceed. >=20 > Because if gperf is not in the path, cc1plus should not be built. > I could just disconnect cc1plus from the build, but then it could > atrophy. >=20 Fine, then it would be logical to use the same test in cc/Makefile as in Makefile.inc1. Specifically: %%% Index: Makefile =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.32 diff -u -r1.32 Makefile --- Makefile 17 May 2002 05:41:47 -0000 1.32 +++ Makefile 17 May 2002 08:44:49 -0000 @@ -10,7 +10,10 @@ .endif =20 .if !defined(NO_CXX) -SUBDIR+=3D cc1plus c++ c++filt +.if ${CXX} !=3D "c++" # gperf is not built by Makefile.inc1 +SUBDIR+=3D cc1plus +.endif +SUBDIR+=3D c++ c++filt .if !defined(NO_COLLECT2) #SUBDIR+=3D collect2 .endif %%% > > "Cross compiling is next step to porting", to quote Terry. >=20 > We are *ALREADY* self hosting. On your i386 box "rm /usr/bin/gperf", > remove any CXX settings you have; and try to build world. >=20 This will now break buildworld, as you have requested me to back out gnu/usr.bin/cc/Makefile,v 1.30 changes. :-) Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age --pAwQNkOnpTn9IO2O Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE85OKpUkv4P6juNwoRAiEAAKCD7Feunztehbq0KMFQN1vMyOUvrgCfYDtT 5HupuRkHss5//2s5VovqOQk= =7rYw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pAwQNkOnpTn9IO2O-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message