From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 27 14:19:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B83D16A403 for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2006 14:19:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.net [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80C4E13C46F for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2006 14:19:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-122-254.51-151.net24.it [151.51.254.122]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kBREQikR063617 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2006 15:26:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from [10.1.2.18] (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBREJdxX018768 for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2006 15:19:40 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Message-ID: <459280FB.4070404@netfence.it> Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 15:19:39 +0100 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061222) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org References: <45914972.2070700@netfence.it> <45917302.4050802@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <45917302.4050802@samsco.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 212.31.247.179 Subject: Re: Hangs with Adaptec 29320 X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 14:19:55 -0000 Scott Long wrote: > Are you trying to get into DDB from the keyboard or from serial? The > latter is more likely to work. I'm trying with the keyboard. I can see if I can get a serial setup; I'm wondering, tough, why should it be more likely to work? > Without some sort of information, it'll > be hard to deduce the problem. I agree. In fact I stated clearly that's what I'm asking help for. bye & Thanks av.