From owner-freebsd-current Tue Jan 7 23:52:33 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id XAA19799 for current-outgoing; Tue, 7 Jan 1997 23:52:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from shadows.aeon.net (bsdcur@shadows.aeon.net [194.100.41.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id XAA19784; Tue, 7 Jan 1997 23:52:23 -0800 (PST) Received: (from bsdcur@localhost) by shadows.aeon.net (8.8.4/8.8.3) id JAA14506; Wed, 8 Jan 1997 09:51:19 +0200 (EET) From: mika ruohotie Message-Id: <199701080751.JAA14506@shadows.aeon.net> Subject: dedicating bandwidth? To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 8 Jan 1997 09:51:19 +0200 (EET) Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk hmm... i think i did ask about this a while back, but didnt get any answers... that leads me to assume my message didnt get thru somehow... anyway, i would like to dedicate bandwidth between my machine, and the ethernet machine(s). meaning that the ethernet can not take the full ppp bandwidth and also that my machine can not take it all so that there's something left for the ethernet users... i expect being "forced" to hack the kernel code, so few pointers would be welcome, i know some c but am no wizard... since i'm running current i would assume -current is somewhat approppriate place, and i would assume someone on the isp land have done it... i dont know how usefull the feature would be, but just depending how hard it is to do, would it be possible to include something like that as a feature? at the moment i use bit over a week old -current (havent upgraded coz there's the swap leakage thingie out there) mickey -- mika ruohotie mika@aeon.net net/sys admin mickey@supsys.fi