Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 22:08:14 +0100 From: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: man 3 getopt char * const argv[] - is const wrong ? Message-ID: <4D5C3CBE.6060801@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <20110216201340.GA23013@britannica.bec.de> References: <201102161831.p1GIVATQ097902@fire.js.berklix.net> <4D5C1A3E.20509@gmx.de> <20110216190233.GB19686@britannica.bec.de> <4D5C24CC.9070400@gmx.de> <20110216201340.GA23013@britannica.bec.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 16.02.2011 21:13, schrieb Joerg Sonnenberger: > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 08:26:04PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote: >> Am 16.02.2011 20:02, schrieb Joerg Sonnenberger: >>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 07:41:02PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote: >>>> But POSIX.1-2008 is the same as the Single >>>> Unix Specification v4 or IEEE Std 1003.1-2008. >>> >>> Minor correction, it is SUS v3 Issue 7. >> >> No it isn't. See http://www.unix.org/version4/ieee_std.html > > "POSIX.1-2008 is simultaneously IEEE Std 1003.1™-2008 and The Open Group > technical Standard Base Specifications, Issue 7." > > Let's agree on that :) > > http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/mindex.html Fine. :) Note that "The Open Group Technical Standard Base Specifications" isn't the same as the "Single Unix Specification". -- Matthias Andree
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D5C3CBE.6060801>