From owner-freebsd-mobile Sun May 13 22:10:47 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from guardian.apnic.net (guardian.apnic.net [203.37.255.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A868D37B422 for ; Sun, 13 May 2001 22:10:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ggm@apnic.net) Received: (from mail@localhost) by guardian.apnic.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA25864 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 15:10:38 +1000 (EST) Received: from hadrian.staff.apnic.net(192.168.1.1) by int-gw.staff.apnic.net via smap (V2.1) id xma025862; Mon, 14 May 01 15:10:27 +1000 Received: (from ggm@localhost) by hadrian.staff.apnic.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA04880 for freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org; Mon, 14 May 2001 15:10:23 +1000 (EST) Message-Id: <200105140510.PAA04880@hadrian.staff.apnic.net> From: ggm@apnic.net To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 15:09 EST Subject: power saving/power usage Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Can somebody give me brief summary on how FreeBSD interacts with so-called power-saving feature-ettes on laptops? I am suspecting that I get less (apparent) time per battery charge on UNIX than on Windeath. I am also suspecting this is because you have to actively frob the CPU to tell it to [drop clock|drop volts|slow down] etc. Clue density -1! (sorry) -George To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message