From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 17 07:40:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E50F16A4CE for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 07:40:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [168.103.84.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7B9A43D39 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 07:40:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j0H7ZhHX039265; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 00:35:43 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 00:36:45 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <20050117.003645.73085084.imp@bsdimp.com> To: doconnor@gsoft.com.au From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <200501171744.34103.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> References: <200501171715.22761.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <20050116.235301.05622144.imp@bsdimp.com> <200501171744.34103.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: jeremie@le-hen.org Subject: Re: no /dev/ums0 when module loaded X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 07:40:47 -0000 In message: <200501171744.34103.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> "Daniel O'Connor" writes: : On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 17:23, M. Warner Losh wrote: : > Works for me. However, it seems that I have a bunch of stuff outside : > the tree that needs to be brought in. And that stuff is mixed in with : > some other stuff that's not ready for prime time, so I have to be : > careful about what I bring in... And there's at least one bug in : : Understood. : : > newbus that I need to find and fix before some things (like anything : > that implements ucom) will work, and another before ugen will : > autodetach... : : It never ends.. :) : : Thanks for working on it. Yup. If I do a naive fix for the ugen problem, it breaks acpi. Warner