From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 30 21:54:37 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15C0D16A417 for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 21:54:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists-fbsd@shadypond.com) Received: from mx-outbound01.easydns.com (mailout.easydns.com [205.210.42.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C900B13C459 for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 21:54:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists-fbsd@shadypond.com) Received: from slider.shadypond.com (69-12-173-117.static.humboldt1.com [69.12.173.117]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx-outbound01.easydns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68F6380B6 for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 17:54:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from slider.shadypond.com (slider.shadypond.com [192.168.1.11]) by slider.shadypond.com (postoffice) with ESMTP id E193FB65AD for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 21:54:31 +0000 (UTC) From: Pollywog To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 21:54:30 +0000 References: <4700052A.7050008@gracenpeace.net> <20070930210305.GB27714@slackbox.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <20070930210305.GB27714@slackbox.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200709302154.30805.lists-fbsd@shadypond.com> Subject: Re: best spam filter port(s) for postfix? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 21:54:37 -0000 On Sunday 30 September 2007 21:03:06 Roland Smith wrote: > On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 03:20:58PM -0500, Joe in MPLS wrote: > > I'm running 6.2-STABLE with postfix with cyrus-sasl, imap-uw & horde for > > mail. I'd like to stop depending on clients(Thunderbird & PDAs) for > > primary spam control (especially because our PDAs don't do any). AV > > scanning would be a plus too. > > I've been using bogofilter for some years now, and it works very well > once you've trained it properly. I'm calling it from procmail just > before the mail is delivered, but that's because my desktop has just a > single local user. Bogofilter comes with a 'integrating-with-postfix' > document that shows you how to call it from postfix directly. I call Bogofilter from Procmail and I did not know it could be called directly from Postfix. I use Bogofilter and Spamassassin and very little spam gets through undetected.