From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jan 24 3:16: 4 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from swan.prod.itd.earthlink.net (swan.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.123]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B7937B402 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 03:16:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from dialup-63.214.217.107.dial1.philadelphia1.level3.net ([63.214.217.107] helo=sparky) by swan.prod.itd.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16ThrL-0001At-00; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 03:16:00 -0800 From: Jud To: swear@blarg.net (Gary W. Swearingen) Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 06:16:30 -0500 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <95FBK736ZUOQOIRQ621USNGCSPHE1Y.3c4fed0e@sparky> Subject: Re: Cooling Athlon / Linux App MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Opera 6.01 build 1028 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG 1/24/2002 2:25:21 AM, swear@blarg.net (Gary W. Swearingen) wrote: >Jud writes: > >> I think if you read the VCool documentation, you'll find that the theory, >> at least, is that the Athlon is unable to reach idle mode unless its >> system bus is disconnected, even when it would otherwise make >> eminent sense for the CPU to do so because the system isn't busy. >> VCool purports to set the "Bus Disconnect Enable" bit and so allow the >> CPU to go into idle mode at appropriate times. > >That quoted phrase doesn't appear in google *freebsd* archive except in >this thread. If you think that's important and different from the >CPU_SUSP_HLT mentioned in another msg, please ask about that on -stable >or -current or -hackers or -hardware (?); maybe they've missed >something. I doubt it, but you seem to have physical evidence of it. I actually don't think it's (supposed to be) any different than CPU_SUSP_HLT, and I'm a bit mystified as to why VCool seems to make a difference on my W2K system. I didn't know about CPU_SUSP_HLT before, so I'll put that in the kernel and see how it works. >(For the thermal paste, get a piece of hard plastic with a smooth straight >edge just a bit wider than the chip and spread it real even but real >thin. I've put it only on the chip the few times I've done it, but I'm >thinking that it would be better to spread it only on the heat sink both >because it is probably rougher and easier to clean the over-spread. I'm >guessing that putting it on both surfaces is more apt to leave bubbles.) I used a razor blade, but the plastic sounds easier to handle. Problems with the thermal paste application may have been caused by my manipulating the rather large heatsink and fan combination so as to get past some nearby capacitors on the motherboard, and then get the @# $%^*! clip seated - I did some wiggling, which may have introduced bubbles. Hopefully, practice will make perfect. Jud To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message