From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 23 21:14:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B3CE106564A for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:14:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simon@nitro.dk) Received: from mx.nitro.dk (zarniwoop.nitro.dk [83.92.207.38]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1869F8FC2C for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:14:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simon@nitro.dk) Received: from arthur.nitro.dk (arthur.bofh [192.168.2.3]) by mx.nitro.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CD9F2D4A42; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:14:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by arthur.nitro.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 411095C15; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:14:29 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:14:29 +0200 From: "Simon L. Nielsen" To: Will Andrews Message-ID: <20090423211428.GB1104@arthur.nitro.dk> References: <2aada3410904212216o128e1fdfx8c299b3531adc694@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2aada3410904212216o128e1fdfx8c299b3531adc694@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CARP as a module; followup thoughts X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:14:30 -0000 On 2009.04.21 23:16:58 -0600, Will Andrews wrote: > Hello, > > I've written a patch (against 8.0-CURRENT as of r191369) which makes > it possible to build, load, run, & unload CARP as a module, using the > GENERIC kernel. It can be obtained from: > > http://firepipe.net/patches/carp-as-module-20090421.diff I don't have any comments on the specific patch, but with my FreeBSD end-user hat, being able to have CARP in GENERIC would be really great. This would allow me to update my systems which use CARP with freebsd-update without manually compiling a kernel. So if the patch doesn't penalize the non-CARP case much, I think it would be great to have this functionality for now, even if it's not the way to go in the long run. -- Simon L. Nielsen