From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 31 15:53:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 868F6106567A for ; Mon, 31 May 2010 15:53:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike.jakubik@intertainservices.com) Received: from mail.intertainservices.com (mail.intertainservices.com [38.99.187.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BE298FC1B for ; Mon, 31 May 2010 15:53:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.10.199] (unknown [172.16.10.199]) by mail.intertainservices.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3A0C05644E for ; Mon, 31 May 2010 11:53:19 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4C03DB6E.7020903@intertainservices.com> Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 11:53:18 -0400 From: Mike Jakubik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <20100531075248.GA15206@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20100531075248.GA15206@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-intertainservices-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-intertainservices-MailScanner-ID: 3A0C05644E.AED10 X-intertainservices-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-intertainservices-MailScanner-From: mike.jakubik@intertainservices.com X-Spam-Status: No Subject: Re: Importing clang/LLVM into FreeBSD HEAD X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 15:53:20 -0000 On 5/31/2010 3:52 AM, Roman Divacky wrote: > Clang can compile all of FreeBSD on i386/amd64 including world and booting > kernel. Other architectures that are close to working are MIPS, PowerPC > and ARM. We have a branch (clangbsd-import) that just includes clang/LLVM > sources and the build infrastructure and this is what we aim to integrate > at first. > What about the thousands of ports? Also, have there been any tests done to compare the performance of the compiled binaries vs gcc? Thanks.