From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Feb  8 13:09:54 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1F56106566B
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Sun,  8 Feb 2009 13:09:54 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com)
Received: from proxy.meer.net (proxy.meer.net [64.13.141.13])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 926858FC08
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Sun,  8 Feb 2009 13:09:54 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com)
Received: from mail.meer.net (mail.meer.net [64.13.141.3])
	by proxy.meer.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n18D9qVj088069;
	Sun, 8 Feb 2009 05:09:52 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com)
Received: from mail2.meer.net (mail2.meer.net [64.13.141.16])
	by mail.meer.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/meer) with ESMTP id n18D90pG013979;
	Sun, 8 Feb 2009 05:09:00 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com)
Received: from 207.sub-75-194-105.myvzw.com.neville-neil.com
	(cpe-68-175-68-135.nyc.res.rr.com [68.175.68.135])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by mail2.meer.net (8.14.1/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n18D8x8o012236;
	Sun, 8 Feb 2009 05:08:59 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com)
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 08:08:59 -0500
Message-ID: <m2ljsh849g.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com>
From: gnn@freebsd.org
To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090208.000115.-1145158523.imp@bsdimp.com>
References: <20090208.000115.-1145158523.imp@bsdimp.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.6 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka)
	FLIM/1.14.9 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Goj=F2?=) APEL/10.7 Emacs/22.3
	(i386-apple-darwin9.6.0) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Spam-Score: undef - spam scanning disabled
X-CanIt-Geo: No geolocation information available for 64.13.141.3
X-CanItPRO-Stream: default
X-Canit-Stats-ID: Bayes signature not available
X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 64.13.141.13
Cc: arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Small syntactic sugar addition to kobj
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 13:09:55 -0000

At Sun, 08 Feb 2009 00:01:15 -0700 (MST),
M. Warner Losh wrote:
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> I'd like to propose a small syntactic sugar coating for kobj.  I'd
> like to propose:
> 
> #define KOBJMETHOD_END { NULL, NULL }
> 
> which can be used in place of the current { 0, 0 } used to end the
> lists in kobj function lists.

That's an easy one.  I don't see why we wouldn't do that.

Later,
George