From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Jun 15  8:21: 4 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDD831509E
	for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 15 Jun 1999 08:21:00 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no)
Received: (from des@localhost)
	by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.1) id RAA39159;
	Tue, 15 Jun 1999 17:20:53 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from des)
To: "David E. Cross" <crossd@cs.rpi.edu>
Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>,
	freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, crossd@cs.rpi.edu
Subject: Re: umapfs...
References: <199906151331.JAA29864@cs.rpi.edu>
From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>
Date: 15 Jun 1999 17:20:53 +0200
In-Reply-To: "David E. Cross"'s message of "Tue, 15 Jun 1999 09:31:23 -0400"
Message-ID: <xzpu2s9ebhm.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
Lines: 11
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

"David E. Cross" <crossd@cs.rpi.edu> writes:
> That is my interpretation of the code.  It would *seem* to just pass the 
> call off to the next FS layer as if the VFS system of the kernel had done it
> directly.... Conceptually I must be missing something.

Umm, umapfs rewrites the owner/group of vnodes if I'm not mistaken.
That's the whole point with it.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message