From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 17:53:55 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC521065675 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 17:53:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from murray@stokely.org) Received: from mail-ew0-f21.google.com (mail-ew0-f21.google.com [209.85.219.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1E958FC1C for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 17:53:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from murray@stokely.org) Received: by ewy14 with SMTP id 14so11542646ewy.19 for ; Fri, 09 Jan 2009 09:53:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.210.90.10 with SMTP id n10mr13195180ebb.173.1231523633605; Fri, 09 Jan 2009 09:53:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.210.60.12 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 09:53:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2a7894eb0901090953r67bdeaf2te11bd5bc3c87d3f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 09:53:53 -0800 From: "Murray Stokely" To: "Doug Barton" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <49663DFE.4040305@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD doc list Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: Would it be useful/appropriate to remove news about betas and RCs?] X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:53:55 -0000 On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 12:14 AM, Doug Barton wrote: > This is sort of along the lines I was thinking, especially about the front > page, and I think that keeping all of the news on the news flash page is > also a good idea. > > I'd like to suggest however that in the RSS feed that they are not valuable. > If I'm looking at the RSS feed as my source of news about FreeBSD it's not > really relevant to me that there were N betas/RCs prior to the release, I > just want to see the news about the release. > > I'm not suggesting that the information about betas and RCs is not valuable, > I just think we need to differentiate between "news" and "history." I've never seen items purged like this from an RSS feed. The chronological nature of RSS makes the older stuff just sort of sink down out of view as newer stuff takes precedence in your feed reader. Removing some old items will just cause even older items to appear higher on the list which could also be irrelevant. Do you have an example RSS feed that does this kind of pruning in a good way? Wouldn't this confuse some feed readers? - Murray