From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jun 5 23:52:51 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from sasi.com (sasi.com [164.164.56.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE75237C0E3 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2000 23:52:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gbnaidu@sasi.com) Received: from samar (sasi.com [164.164.56.2]) by sasi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA27601 for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 12:20:17 +0530 (IST) Received: from pcd75.sasi.com ([10.0.16.75]) by sasi.com; Tue, 06 Jun 2000 12:20:15 +0000 (IST) Received: from localhost (gbnaidu@localhost) by pcd75.sasi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA01230; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 12:20:06 +0530 Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 12:20:06 +0530 (IST) From: "G.B.Naidu" To: Duncan Barclay Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: wakeup() question In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, For me it appears that the process should be marked as runnable. But I am not sure. thanks --gb On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, Duncan Barclay wrote: > Hi all > > Does wakeup() ever cause a sleeping processes to run before the wakeup() > function returns, or does it just mark the process as running? > > Duncan > > --- > ________________________________________________________________________ > Duncan Barclay | God smiles upon the little children, > dmlb@ragnet.demon.co.uk | the alcoholics, and the permanently stoned. > ________________________________________________________________________ > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > -- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message