Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:42:26 -0800 From: bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net> To: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Inkscape package troubles, "libicuuc.so.62" not found Message-ID: <20181122004226.GA64483@www.zefox.net> In-Reply-To: <20181120175328.GE19753@albert.catwhisker.org> References: <20181119235722.GA53159@www.zefox.net> <20181120004318.GA72711@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20181120165257.GA56335@www.zefox.net> <20181120175328.GE19753@albert.catwhisker.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 09:53:28AM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: > I strongly suspect that you are encountering "complications" because of > a lack of consistency with respect to installed ports/packages on the > system in question. > > That is, "consistency" with respect to the state of the underlying ports > tree(s) that was/were used to build the ports & packages in question. > I broke inkscape by mistakenly deleting an old library required by the old(ish) port of inkscape. Libmap.conf provided an escape in this case. More generally, is there a way to determine what revision of the ports tree will successfully compile/run a given port, if it existed in the past? Thanks for reading, bob prohaska
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20181122004226.GA64483>