From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Oct  6 14:23:34 2007
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C758716A418;
	Sat,  6 Oct 2007 14:23:34 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from scottl@samsco.org)
Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DA0913C455;
	Sat,  6 Oct 2007 14:23:34 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from scottl@samsco.org)
Received: from [192.168.254.15] (ydesk.samsco.home [192.168.254.15])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l96ENOKj083550;
	Sat, 6 Oct 2007 08:23:24 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from scottl@samsco.org)
Message-ID: <47079A5C.3090109@samsco.org>
Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2007 08:23:24 -0600
From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US;
	rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050416
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?UTF-8?B?RGFnLUVybGluZyBTbcO4cmdyYXY=?= <des@des.no>
References: <200710052249.l95Mn9Nb071852@repoman.freebsd.org>	<20071005231538.GA24016@owl.midgard.homeip.net>	<2a41acea0710051705l217224b6vc705dc6139b94e3b@mail.gmail.com>	<20071006004634.GA24962@owl.midgard.homeip.net>	<47073AF5.1010109@samsco.org>
	<86d4vspk8j.fsf@ds4.des.no>
In-Reply-To: <86d4vspk8j.fsf@ds4.des.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by
	milter-greylist-2.0.2 (pooker.samsco.org [192.168.254.1]);
	Sat, 06 Oct 2007 08:23:24 -0600 (MDT)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed
	version=3.1.8
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on pooker.samsco.org
Cc: Jack F Vogel <jfv@freebsd.org>, cvs-src@freebsd.org,
	src-committers@freebsd.org, Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com>,
	cvs-all@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf files kern.pre.mk
 src/sys/dev/em	LICENSE
 e1000_80003es2lan.c e1000_80003es2lan.h e1000_82540.c	e1000_82541.c
 e1000_82541.h
 e1000_82542.c e1000_82543.c	e1000_82543.h e1000_82571.c e1000_82571.h
 e1000_82575.c ...
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2007 14:23:34 -0000

Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:

> Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> writes:
> 
>>What do you expect to accomplish by lecturing a vendor who has shown
>>very good faith over the years in supporting FreeBSD?  Maybe we should
>>tell Intel to piss off since you obviously know how to support their
>>hardware much better than they do.
> 
> 
> We used to have a principle that commit bits were granted to individuals
> on their individual merit, not simply because they represented a vendor
> and were paid to work on drivers for that vendor's hardware.
> 

Are you implying that Jack has no merit?  That's an unfortunate
assertion.  What evidence do you have to support that?

> We also used to have a principle that changes should be tested before
> being committed, especially to -STABLE.

I guess you missed that part where Jack said that the changes had
undergone extensive testing.

Scott