From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Apr 30 00:15:47 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id AAA11153
          for current-outgoing; Sun, 30 Apr 1995 00:15:47 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id AAA11146
          ; Sun, 30 Apr 1995 00:15:46 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.cdrom.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol
To: davidg@Root.COM
cc: current@freefall.cdrom.com
Subject: Re: if_fddisubr.c 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 29 Apr 95 22:19:01 PDT."
             <199504300519.WAA03214@corbin.Root.COM> 
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 1995 00:15:45 -0700
Message-ID: <11145.799226145@freefall.cdrom.com>
From: Gary Palmer (FreeBSD/ARM Team) <gpalmer@freefall.cdrom.com>
Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In message <199504300519.WAA03214@corbin.Root.COM>, David Greenman writes:
>   This is the third report I've gotten about this. It is of course fixable,
>but the 'right' fix is probably to remove the netiso code. Noone in our group
>has the ability to test it, and as far as I know it is broken and useless. The
>errors are ocurring because LINT defines options "ISO" and the if_fddisubr.c's
>ISO code is out of date.

In that case, perhaps we should take NetISO out of all the kernels
that have it (probably only LINT) as it (i.e. NETISO) doesn't compile
anyhow after your change of the inet PCB's to a hashing system...

Objections?

Anyone using this cruft?

Gary