From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Dec  2 23:07:46 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A95016A4CE
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Thu,  2 Dec 2004 23:07:46 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org
	(CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.143])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFAEB43D1F
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Thu,  2 Dec 2004 23:07:45 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 0720B512C6; Thu,  2 Dec 2004 15:13:16 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 15:13:16 -0800
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: David Syphers <dsyphers@u.washington.edu>
Message-ID: <20041202231316.GA41896@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <200412021201.50234.dsyphers@u.washington.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200412021201.50234.dsyphers@u.washington.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
cc: questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: portupgrade, packages, and same versions
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 23:07:46 -0000


--vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 12:01:50PM -0800, David Syphers wrote:
> I just upgraded to 5-STABLE from an older version of 5, and wanted to reb=
uild=20
> all my ports because of the ABI compatability breakage just before 5-RELE=
ASE.=20
> I ran across behavior in portupgrade that I don't understand - if I force=
 an=20
> upgrade because I already have the same version installed, portupgrade=20
> refuses to use packages. e.g.
>=20
> --->  Found a package of 'net/cvsup-without-gui': cvsup-without-gui-16.1h=
.tbz=20
> (cvsup-without-gui-16.1h)
> --->  Located a package version 16.1h (cvsup-without-gui-16.1h.tbz)
> ** Ignoring the package, which is the same version as is installed (16.1h)
> ** No package available: net/cvsup-without-gui
>=20
> What on earth is wrong with portupgrade, and is there any way of convinci=
ng it=20
> to use packages in this case? If I run 'portupgrade -rafP' it will merril=
y =20
> upgrade via ports when forcing an upgrade, so why not packages?

What command-line are you using?

Kris

--vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFBr6GMWry0BWjoQKURAoFyAJwLY+Sf5K5glnzEEbTzXoBN0Ez8ywCgyJN9
kt9Dmy0mGlnUkhMK1eVt0iw=
=RMs2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL--