From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jul 10 19:06:30 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id TAA00501 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 19:06:30 -0700 Received: from cs.weber.edu (cs.weber.edu [137.190.16.16]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id TAA00494 ; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 19:06:26 -0700 Received: by cs.weber.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1.1) id AA29272; Mon, 10 Jul 95 19:57:53 MDT From: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert) Message-Id: <9507110157.AA29272@cs.weber.edu> Subject: Re: token ring anyone To: matt@lkg.dec.com (Matt Thomas) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 95 19:57:52 MDT Cc: jkh@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199507100938.JAA12786@whydos.lkg.dec.com> from "Matt Thomas" at Jul 10, 95 09:38:16 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4dev PL52] Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > > > Of course that still leaves the problem of doing source routing ... > > > > And LLC. But the LLC code could actually also be used for NetBIOS/SMB > > for LanMan, so it would have large usage -- it's just a bitch of a state > > machine. As was noted the last time Token Ring came up, much of the > > necessary code (minus some critical pieces) exists in the X.25/X.29 stuff > > that is/was in the source tree. > > Having already done FDDI support (which requires LLC support), I can > flatly state that Terry overstates the problem. The LLC support is > trivial and can be stolen directly from my FDDI support. This is a general implementation? I was unaware that one was publically available before now... if it's a full implementation, then never mind, the source routing *is* the problem. > Source routing (which is in the MAC header and has nothing to do with > LLC) is the main problem. It's messy but doable. Like the LLC, I think the source routing can also be stolen: from IPNG, which has been implemented for FreeBSD. 8-). Terry Lambert terry@cs.weber.edu --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.