From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 23 06:18:07 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3784D181 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 06:18:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E721A2476 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 06:18:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VYrlQ-00077r-Tk for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 08:17:52 +0200 Received: from pool-71-163-112-98.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([71.163.112.98]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 08:17:52 +0200 Received: from nightrecon by pool-71-163-112-98.washdc.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 08:17:52 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Subject: Re: FreeBSD, Centos and ZFS - SOLVED Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 02:17:41 -0400 Lines: 33 Message-ID: References: <1381600575.18393.33219025.5D7B78D0@webmail.messagingengine.com> <8CA809B3-1692-4760-A63F-9D7451EB49BD@gmail.com> <525D143B.50202@gmail.com> <1382285088.2462.36238881.1AA6BB17@webmail.messagingengine.com> <25C055B9-4A19-46C8-B78E-AC8BD6E00CD9@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-71-163-112-98.washdc.fios.verizon.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: nightrecon@hotmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 06:18:07 -0000 aurfalien wrote: > On Oct 22, 2013, at 7:55 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > >> Well, the 30% diff in performance due to those two intel CPU options >> means that somehow the scheduler and power management stuff in FreeBSD >> isn't playing with turbo boost / speedstep. >> >> So yeah, figuring out why would be nice. > > Ditto. > > I never enabled powerd in FreeBSD9 or 10. Unsure what the default > position is. > > In CentOS, I usually just set a diff BIOS feature as disabled or > performance depending on what the options are. > > On this server, it had acoustic/performance/balance as well as well as > that CPU option which threw me off. > > - aurf > > You might find this interesting: http://www.ateamsystems.com/blog/Increase-FreeBSD-Performance-With-powerd -Mike