Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 10:21:52 -0600 From: Hamilton Hoover <hamilton@twopoint.com> To: Eric De La Cruz Lugo <eric@iteso.mx> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Performance comparison. Message-ID: <3A155B20.9A35B2A8@twopoint.com> References: <200011112225.eABMPcW332585@saturn.cs.uml.edu> <Pine.LNX.4.10.10011111746430.16421-100000@dragon.ccmr.cornell.edu> <20001116160034.A28365@widomaker.com> <008801c0501b$74113e00$4d011c0a@delacruz.avis.com.mx>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> HI!, there is a performance comparisson between an Intel CELERON > Processor > at 600 Mhz and a Pentium III Xeon at the same speed (600Mhz)? > > I ask this because am going to buy a processor for a FreeBSD > system, it will > be used has desktop (some times) and home server (Proxy server for > other 3 > computers with Win98, maybe this FreeBSD server will be used has a > Web > Server and SQL (Postgress or solid) Server in the near future. > > This server will have 1 64 MB DIMM or 128 MB DIMM and a IDE DISK > SAMSUNG > with 10.2GB Have you priced a Xenon? Think about what you want your system to be able to do. The Xenon is the better chip but at a huge cost difference. You may want to think about getting the celeron pumping up the memory and going scsi before you go with the Xenon. IMHO Hamilton Hoover To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3A155B20.9A35B2A8>